
<rss version="0.91">
    <channel>
        <title>Latest Articles from Aquatic Invasions</title>
        <description>Latest 2 Articles from Aquatic Invasions</description>
        <link>https://aquaticinvasions.arphahub.com/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 07:45:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Pensoft FeedCreator</generator>
        
	
		<item>
		    <title>Habitat and landscape variables affecting Corbicula fluminea presence in the upper Savannah River drainage (USA)</title>
		    <link>https://aquaticinvasions.arphahub.com/article/189571/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Aquatic Invasions 21(2): 111-126</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3391/ai.2026.21.2.189571</p>
					<p>Authors: Zachary M. Schumber, Michael A. Baker, Brian J. Irwin, Martin J. Hamel, Peter D. Hazelton</p>
					<p>Abstract: Aquatic invasive species (AIS) are amongst the greatest threats to native aquatic biodiversity. These introduced species often thrive in human-altered environments and spread through human-mediated pathways to invade new watersheds. Corbicula fluminea is a freshwater bivalve native to southeastern Asia first introduced in North America in Seattle, WA, in 1938 and has spread to nearly every major watershed in the southeastern United States. In the present study, we use an information theoretic framework to compare landscape and stream habitat variables associated with C. fluminea presence across five HUC10 watersheds in the upper Savannah River basin of South Carolina and Georgia, USA. Predictive models included landscape-level and site-level habitat variables associated with agricultural, developed, and forested landscapes. Models with variables associated with forested and developed landscapes were the top performing models based on AICc values. In top performing models C. fluminea presence was positively correlated with increased stream width, but negatively correlated with substrates dominated by cobble. Lower performing models highlight positive correlations with the presence of upstream reservoirs and increased developed landscape surrounding the site. Identification of habitat and landscape correlates with invasive species presence may lead to more efficient introduction monitoring efforts for conservation managers.</p>
					<p><a href="https://aquaticinvasions.arphahub.com/article/189571/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://aquaticinvasions.arphahub.com/article/189571/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://aquaticinvasions.arphahub.com/article/189571/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Horizon scanning for potentially invasive non-native marine species to inform trans-boundary conservation management – Example of the northern Gulf of Mexico</title>
		    <link>https://aquaticinvasions.arphahub.com/article/114182/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Aquatic Invasions 18(4): 415-453</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3391/ai.2023.18.4.114182</p>
					<p>Authors: Kathryn A. O’Shaughnessy, Lorenzo Vilizzi, Wesley Daniel, Monica E. McGarrity, Hanna Bauer, Leslie Hartman, Stephen Geiger, Paul Sammarco, Steve Kolian, Scott Porter, Jessica Dutton, Matthew R. McClure, Michael Norberg, Alex Fogg, Timothy J. Lyons, Justin Procopio, Lauren Bantista, Wayne Bennett, Mary Wicksten, David Reeves, Julie Lively, Elizabeth Robinson, Jorge Brenner, Joseph Goy, Ashley Morgan-Olvera, Anna L. E. Yunnie, Gordon H. Copp</p>
					<p>Abstract: Prevention of non-native species introductions and establishment is essential to avoid adverse impacts of invasive species in marine environments. To identify potential new invasive species and inform non-native species management options for the northern Gulf of Mexico (Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas), 138 marine species were risk screened for current and future climate conditions using the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit. Species were risk-ranked as low, medium, high, and very high risk based on separate (calibrated) thresholds for fishes, tunicates, and invertebrates. In the basic screening, 15 fishes, two tunicates, and 26 invertebrates were classified as high or very high risk under current climate conditions. Whereas, under future climate conditions, 16 fishes, three tunicates, and 33 invertebrates were classified as high or very high risk. Very high risk species included: California scorpionfish Scorpaena guttata, red scorpionfish Scorpaena scrofa, purple whelk Rapana venosa, and Santo Domingo false mussel Mytilopsis sallei under both current and future climates, with weedy scorpionfish Rhinopias frondosa, Papuan scorpionfish Scorpaenopsis papuensis, daggertooth pike conger Muraenesox cinereus, yellowfin scorpionfish Scorpaenopsis neglecta, tassled scorpionfish Scorpaenopsis oxycephalus, brush-clawed shore crab Hemigrapsus takanoi, honeycomb oyster Hyotissa hyotis, carinate rock shell Indothais lacera, and Asian green mussel Perna viridis under climate change conditions only. This study provides evidence to inform trans-boundary management plans across the five Gulf of Mexico states to prevent, detect, and respond rapidly to new species arrivals.</p>
					<p><a href="https://aquaticinvasions.arphahub.com/article/114182/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://aquaticinvasions.arphahub.com/article/114182/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://aquaticinvasions.arphahub.com/article/114182/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 8 Nov 2023 20:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>
	